Enable javascript in your browser for better experience. Need to know to enable it?

ºÚÁÏÃÅ

La informaci¨®n en esta p¨¢gina no se encuentra completamente disponible en tu idioma de preferencia. Muy pronto esperamos tenerla completamente disponible en otros idiomas. Para obtener informaci¨®n en tu idioma de preferencia, por favor descarga el PDF ²¹±ç³Ü¨ª.
?ltima actualizaci¨®n : Jan 28, 2014
NO EN LA EDICI?N ACTUAL
Este blip no est¨¢ en la edici¨®n actual del Radar. Si ha aparecido en una de las ¨²ltimas ediciones, es probable que siga siendo relevante. Si es m¨¢s antiguo, es posible que ya no sea relevante y que nuestra valoraci¨®n sea diferente hoy en d¨ªa. Desgraciadamente, no tenemos el ancho de banda necesario para revisar continuamente los anuncios de ediciones anteriores del Radar. Entender m¨¢s
Jan 2014
Probar ?
The expansion of single-page and mobile browser-based applications into mainstream use, along with continued growth of node.js for server-side applications, have led to increased adoption of CoffeeScript to simplify JavaScript codebases. As a language that compiles into JavaScript code for runtime execution, many concerns have been raised about the difficulty of debugging applications written in CoffeeScript. The introduction of Source Maps in CoffeeScript 1.6.1 is helping producers of development tools address this concern. We expect this will lead to further adoption of the language following the lead of highly visible technology firms such as Dropbox.
May 2013
Probar ?
Mar 2012
Probar ?
JavaScript is a powerful, ubiquitous programming language with tricky and error prone syntax. Coffeescript fixes many of the warts of JavaScript in a clean, simple syntax that generates readable JavaScript. For example, creating true private variables in JavaScript is a syntactic nightmare; CoffeeScript generates the technically correct but hideous syntax. Some readers may be confused by our advocacy of Coffeescript given our general dislike for GWT, because on the surface they seem similar: tools that generate JavaScript. However, it is the level of abstraction that differs. GWT has an elaborate component model, which tries to hide details about the underlying language (JavaScript) and platform (the web). Coffeescript tries to make it easier to write proper JavaScript, avoiding pathological but default ¡°features¡± of JavaScript, and does not build a layer that tries to insulate you from the platform.
Jul 2011
Probar ?
Publicado : Jul 30, 2011

Suscr¨ªbete al bolet¨ªn informativo de Technology Radar

?

?

?

?

Suscr¨ªbete ahora

Visita nuestro archivo para leer los vol¨²menes anteriores